Azure IoT vs AWS IoT vs Google IoT Pricing: Feature Comparison Chart for Enterprise [2025]

Azure IoT vs AWS IoT vs Google IoT Pricing: Feature Comparison Chart for Enterprise [2025]

Introduction

The Internet of Things (IoT) helps businesses run better by connecting devices, collecting information, and improving choices. But picking the best IoT cloud provider can be confusing. The main three are AWS IoT vs Azure IoT vs Google IoT. Some businesses choose Azure IoT over AWS IoT because it works better with Microsoft tools. Others prefer Google Cloud IoT instead of AWS IoT because it’s great for data analysis.

Why Pricing and Features Matter for Businesses

Businesses need to think carefully before choosing an IoT platform. Here’s why:

Why Pricing and Features Matter for Businesses

  • Scalability:

The platform should grow with the business without becoming too expensive.

  • Security & Compliance:

Businesses must protect their data and follow security rules. IoT cloud providers should offer strong security features.

  • Compatibility:

If a company already uses Microsoft tools, it might compare AWS IoT Core and Azure IoT Hub. Others may check Google IoT Platform and AWS IoT to see which fits better.

  • Cost vs Value:

The cheapest option isn’t always the best. Some platforms offer extra tools that help businesses in the long run.

In this blog, we will provide an IoT Platforms Comparison: AWS IoT vs Azure IoT vs Google IoT Core, focusing on their pricing, features, and business benefits.

Key Features of AWS IoT, Azure IoT, and Google IoT

When choosing an IoT cloud service, businesses look for tools that help them manage devices, keep data safe, and analyze information. AWS IoT, Azure IoT, and Google IoT all offer these features, but they do things a little differently.

Managing IoT Devices

Companies with thousands of smart devices need an easy way to control them.

AWS IoT Core lets businesses connect and manage devices, but it can be tricky to set up, especially for companies that don’t already use AWS services.

Azure IoT Hub makes this process simpler, especially for businesses that use Microsoft products. It also includes Azure IoT Edge, which allows devices to process data locally instead of sending everything to the cloud. This is helpful when internet access is slow or unreliable.

Google Cloud IoT used to have a service called Google IoT Core, but it was discontinued. Now, businesses must use other Google tools to manage their devices, which can be more complicated.

Keeping IoT Data Safe

Security is one of the biggest concerns and challenges in IoT cloud services because connected devices can be hacked if they aren’t well protected.

AWS IoT Core has strong security features, including encryption (which protects data) and identity management (which controls who can access the system).

Azure IoT Hub takes security a step further by working with Microsoft Defender for IoT. This tool helps businesses detect threats and stop cyberattacks before they happen.

Google Cloud IoT also offers encryption and identity management, but businesses may need to set up these tools manually to get the most protection.

Using AI and Data Analytics

IoT devices gather a lot of data, but businesses need analytics tools to make sense of it.

AWS IoT Core works well with AWS SageMaker, which helps companies use AI to predict trends. However, setting up analytics on AWS can take extra effort.

Azure IoT Hub connects easily with Azure AI and Power BI, making it simple to track trends and create reports. This is especially useful for businesses already using Microsoft tools.

Google Cloud IoT is great for data analysis. It works with BigQuery and Vertex AI, which are some of the best tools for handling large amounts of data. But since Google IoT Core was discontinued, businesses might need extra setup to get everything working.

Let’s compare the pricing of these platforms to help businesses find the best value.

AWS IoT vs Azure IoT vs Google IoT – IoT Platform Pricing Comparison

AWS IoT vs Azure IoT vs Google IoT – IoT Platform Pricing Comparison

The cost of using an IoT cloud platform is a key factor for businesses that want to connect and manage smart devices. However, pricing is not always straightforward. There are different types of costs, and if businesses don’t plan carefully, they might end up paying more than expected.

Here, we’ll explain how AWS IoT, Azure IoT, and Google Cloud IoT charge for their services in a simple way. We’ll also cover hidden costs that can add up over time.

1. How Do IoT Cloud Platforms Charge?

Before comparing the three platforms, let’s first understand how IoT pricing works. These services don’t have a single fixed cost; instead, they charge for different things based on how much and how often you use them.

Message Pricing (Cost of Sending and Receiving Data)

Smart devices send and receive data (known as messages) over the internet. The more messages a device sends to the cloud (or receives from the cloud), the more you pay.

All three platformsβ€”AWS, Azure, and Googleβ€”charge per million messages. Some offer discounts if you send a very large number of messages, while others stick to a flat rate.

Device Management Fees (Cost of Keeping Devices Running Smoothly)

Managing connected devices involves things like software updates, tracking device health, and fixing issues remotely. While some basic features are free, advanced featuresβ€”such as bulk updates and automatic monitoringβ€”may come at an extra cost.

Storage Costs (Saving IoT Data for Future Use)

IoT devices gather a lot of data, and businesses often need to store this information for future use or compliance reasons. Some cloud platforms provide a small amount of free storage, but beyond that, they charge based on how much data is stored and how long it’s kept.

Security Costs (Protecting IoT Devices and Data)

While basic security features like encryption and password protection are included, advanced security options such as extra authentication, real-time threat detection, and compliance with industry standards often come at an additional cost.

Analytics & AI Costs (Processing and Understanding IoT Data)

Many businesses analyze IoT data usingAI and machine learning tools. Some cloud platforms include basic data analytics for free, but advanced AI-powered processing requires extra payment.

2. Free Tiers – Testing IoT Platforms Without Paying

Most cloud providers let businesses use their IoT services for free at first, so they can try them out before paying. However, each provider offers different free benefits.

  • AWS IoT Core: Offers 500,000 free messages per month for the first 12 months only. After a year, standard charges apply.
  • Azure IoT Hub: Provides 8,000 free messages per day (about 240,000 messages per month) without a time limit.
  • Google Cloud IoT Core: Does not offer a specific free tier but gives a $300 free credit to use across all Google Cloud services, including IoT.

3. Paid Plans – Understanding Ongoing IoT Costs

After the free period, businesses have to pay based on their usage. Here’s a look at how the pricing compares:

  • AWS IoT Core: Charges $1.00 per million messages. However, businesses must pay extra for security, device management, and data analytics.
  • Azure IoT Hub: Starts at $0.80 per million messages, which is cheaper than AWS. Some basic security and device management features are included.
  • Google Cloud IoT Core: Costs $0.45 per million operations, making it the cheapest per message. However, it doesn’t include built-in security or device management, so businesses must pay for separate services.

While Google IoT Core seems the cheapest per message, the total cost may increase due to separate security and management services that are included in Azure’s plan.

4. Hidden Costs – Extra Fees That Affect Total Expenses

Along with the standard pricing, businesses should also be aware of extra costs that can significantly impact on the final bill.

Data Transfer Fees (Moving Data Between Cloud Services)

When IoT data moves between different services, some platforms charge an extra fee:

  • AWS IoT Core: Charges separately for transferring IoT data to other AWS services.
  • Azure IoT Hub: Includes some free data transfers, but large amounts of data still incur costs.
  • Google Cloud IoT Core: Also charges extra for moving data, depending on where it is stored and accessed.

Security & Compliance Fees (Extra Protection for IoT Systems)

While basic security is included, advanced security tools cost more:

  • AWS IoT Device Defender: Extra cost for real-time threat detection and compliance monitoring.
  • Azure IoT Hub: Includes some basic security but extra features require payment.
  • Google Cloud IoT Core: Requires businesses to buy separate Google Cloud security services.

Edge Computing Fees (Processing IoT Data Closer to Devices)

Instead of sending all data to the cloud, some businesses use edge computing to process information closer to the device. Each cloud platform has different pricing: AWS Greengrass vs Azure IoT Edge vs Google Cloud IoT Core.

  • AWS Greengrass: Paid add-on for edge computing.
  • Azure IoT Edge: Included as part of Azure IoT Hub, making it cheaper for businesses using both cloud and edge computing.
  • Google Cloud IoT Core: No built-in edge computing, requiring third-party tools, which adds to the cost.

Long-Term Storage Fees (Keeping IoT Data for Future Use)

Since Internet of things (IoT) devices generate huge amounts of data, long-term storage fees can quickly add up.

  • AWS: Charges based on how much data is stored and for how long (using AWS S3 or AWS DynamoDB).
  • Azure: IT includes some storage in IoT Hub plans, making it more cost-effective for businesses storing data long-term.
  • Google Cloud: Requires separate storage plans, which can increase costs over time.

5. What Affects the Cost of IoT Services?

The total cost of using an IoT cloud platform depends on several things, such as:

  • Number of Messages Sent: The more messages a business sends between devices and the cloud, the higher the cost becomes. Some platforms provide discounts and offers when sending large amounts of data.
  • Device Management: Companies that need automatic software updates, remote monitoring, and troubleshooting need to pay extra for these services.
  • Security Needs: Healthcare and Banking industries need extra security to safeguard their data. Adding these security features can make the service more expensive.
  • Data Analysis and AI: Businesses that use real data tracking or smart technology may have to pay extra for these advanced features.

By understanding these costs, businesses can plan better and choose an option that fits in their budget.

Let's Discuss Your Project

Get free Consultation and let us know your project idea to turn into anΒ  amazing digital product.

IoT Platform Performance & Scalability – How Well Do They Handle Growth?

When businesses choose an IoT cloud platform, it’s not just about pricing. They also need to consider how well the platform performs and whether it can scale as their needs grow. A small business with a few devices today might have thousands or even millions of connected devices in the future. The right platform should handle this growth smoothly without slowing down or becoming too expensive.

In this section, we’ll compare AWS IoT Core, Azure IoT Hub, and Google Cloud IoT Core based on:

  • Performance – How quickly and reliably they process data.
  • Scalability – How well they handle a growing number of connected devices.
  • Latency & Reliability – How fast and stable they are when sending and receiving data.
  • Global Availability – Where their data centers are located and how that affects businesses worldwide.

IoT Platform Performance & Scalability – How Well Do They Handle Growth?

1. Performance: How Fast & Reliable Are These Platforms?

When IoT devices send data to cloud, businesses expect quick responses and minimal downtime. Each platform has a different way of managing and processing this data.

  • AWS IoT Core is built on Amazon’s cloud infrastructure, known for its reliability and can handle millions of messages per second and integrates well with other AWS services.
  • Azure IoT Hub offers built-in security and supports millions of devices with low-latency communication. It also works well with Microsoft’s AI and analytics tools.
  • Google Cloud IoT Core relies on Google’s global network, which provides strong performance for companies using big data and machine learning. However, Google IoT Core has been discontinued, which means businesses may need to switch to other Google services.

2. Scalability: Can the Platform Grow with Your Business?

Scalability plays a significant role for businesses planning to expand their IoT operations. Whether a company has 10 devices or 10 million, the platform should handle the increased load without performance issues.

  • AWS IoT Core grows on its own, so businesses don’t need to add more servers. It can handle many connected devices, but some extra AWS services might be needed for all features to work.
  • Azure IoT Hub offers automatic scaling options, allowing businesses to increase capacity as needed. It’s ideal for companies using Microsoft tools like Power BI and Azure AI for data processing.
  • Google Cloud IoT Core is designed to handle large-scale IoT operations, but since Google has ended support for this service, businesses must now explore alternatives within the Google Cloud ecosystem.

3. Latency & Reliability: How Fast Do They Process Data?

Latency means the time it takes to send and receive data. In industries like healthcare, transportation, and manufacturing, even a slight delay can cause issues.

  • AWS IoT Core provides low-latency communication and supports real-time messaging, making it reliable for time-sensitive applications.
  • Azure IoT Hub has strong real-time processing capabilities, making it useful for businesses that rely on fast decision-making. It also provides better integration with AI for predictive insights.
  • Google Cloud IoT Core had low-latency features, but since its discontinuation, businesses must use other Google Cloud tools for IoT data management.

4. Global Availability: Where Are the Data Centers Located?

The location of a cloud provider’s data centers can impact speed, security, and compliance. Businesses operating worldwide need a platform with data centers in multiple regions to ensure smooth performance.

  • AWS IoT Core has data centers in 30+ regions worldwide, offering strong global coverage.
  • Azure IoT Hub operates in 60+ regions, giving it the broadest coverage and ensuring better performance for international businesses.
  • Google Cloud IoT Core used Google’s global infrastructure, but since it has been shut down, businesses must rely on Google’s other cloud services for IoT needs.

Security and Compliance Considerations: IoT Platform Comparison

When choosing an IoT platform, businesses must focus on security and following industry regulations because IoT devices handle important data. AWS IoT Core, Azure IoT Hub, and Google Cloud IoT Core all provide strong security, but they do it in different ways.

  • AWS IoT Core offers device authentication, monitoring tools, and data encryption to keep information safe while it moves and when it’s stored. It also follows important security rules like ISO 27001, HIPAA, and GDPR, making it a good option for industries with strict regulations.
  • Azure IoT Hub works with Microsoft Defender for IoT to provide real-time threat detection and security alerts. It also meets security standards like SOC 2, ISO 27018, and GDPR, making it a great choice for companies that need strong protection.
  • Google Cloud IoT Core used Google’s advanced security tools to verify devices and encrypt communication. However, Google stopped offering IoT Core in 2023, so businesses now use other Google services like Edge TPU and Pub/Sub for IoT needs.

While all three platforms offer strong security, Azure IoT Hub is best for businesses already using Microsoft services, AWS IoT Core is great for industries needing strict security compliance, and Google Cloud offers security-driven IoT tools despite shutting down its IoT Core service.

Eager to discuss about your project ?

Share your project idea with us. Together, we’ll transform your vision into an exceptional digital product!

Conclusion

Choosing the best IoT platform depends on cost, security, scalability, and how well it fits with your business needs. AWS IoT Core is good for industries needing strong security rules, Azure IoT Hub works well with Microsoft tools, and Google Cloud offers other IoT services after closing its IoT Core. The right choice depends on your budget, security needs, and business goals.

For companies in the oil and gas industry, choosing an IoT platform isn’t just about featuresβ€”it’s about cutting costs and improving operations. To learn more about how IoT can help reduce high operational costs, check out our related blog:

➑ How to Reduce High Operational Costs with IoT Solutions in Oil and Gas Industry?

Cleared Doubts: FAQs

Each platform has its own strengths:
  • Azure IoT is great at handling data near devices (edge computing) and analyzing information in real-time. It works well for businesses using other Microsoft tools.
  • AWS IoT offers the most variety in IoT services, making it suitable for all size of businesses. It has flexible pricing and works well with Amazon’s cloud services.
  • Google IoT is best for working with large amounts of data and analytics. It connects well with Google’s AI and machine learning tools.

Azure IoT and AWS IoT allow businesses to control devices, update software, and monitor performance. Google IoT focuses more on making device connections seamless and automatic.

Both Azure IoT and AWS IoT are great for large businesses because they provide scalable solutions (they grow with your business). Azure IoT is slightly better for enterprise-level needs.

  • Azure IoT works well with other Microsoft services, making it great for businesses already using Azure.
  • AWS IoT integrates with many AWS cloud tools, providing users a wide range of customization options.
  • Google IoT is best for companies that use Google Cloud, BigQuery, and AI-based analytics.
  • Azure IoT: Can easily scale with growing business needs.
  • AWS IoT: Designed to handle a large number of devices and data streams.
  • Google IoT: Focuses on scalable data processing and analytics.

All three platforms offer strong customer support, but the quality may vary based on business size and location.

AWS IoT has the most detailed documentation, making it easier for businesses to learn and get started.

Yes! Azure IoT, AWS IoT, and Google IoT all support third-party integrations, but Azure and AWS offer more flexibility.

  • Azure IoT stores data using Azure Storage and Azure Data Lake.
  • AWS IoT saves data in Amazon S3 and Amazon DynamoDB.
  • Google IoT uses Google Cloud Storage and BigQuery.
  • Azure IoT: Works in the cloud, on devices, and in hybrid environments.
  • AWS IoT: Supports both cloud and edge-based deployments.
  • Google IoT: Also supports cloud and edge-based applications.

AWS IoT is often considered the most user-friendly, especially for businesses already using AWS services.

All three platforms provide strong connectivity options, but Google IoT makes it the easiest for devices to connect automatically.

  • Azure IoT allows extensive customization through Azure AI and analytics services.
  • AWS IoT provides many options through its large number of tools and services.
  • Google IoT is strong in AI-based customization.

Google IoT is the best choice for machine learning and AI-driven IoT applications.

All three platforms offer automated software updates and maintenance features to keep IoT devices secure.

Yes, all three platforms follow strict security regulations and compliance standards to keep data safe.

Related Topics

Predictive Maintenance in Oil and Gas with Generative AI and MongoDB
Predictive Maintenance in Oil and Gas with Generative AI and MongoDB

The oil and gas industry works in some of the most challenging and most demanding environments on the planet. From offshore rigs to large refineries, the machinery and infrastructure that powers this sector is extremely important for the global energy supply chain. However, equipment failures can lead to costly downtime, security risks and environmental hazards

Read More Β»
Healthcare Data Management and Security with Azure and .NET Core
Healthcare Data Management and Security with Azure and .NET Core

In the healthcare industry, managing and securing sensitive patient data is paramount. With the increasing adoption of cloud technologies, healthcare organizations are leveraging platforms like Microsoft Azure to store, process, and analyse healthcare data. However, with this shift comes the responsibility

Read More Β»

Globally Esteemed on Leading Rating Platforms

Earning Global Recognition: A Testament to Quality Work and Client Satisfaction. Our Business Thrives on Customer Partnership

5.0

5.0

5.0

5.0

Book Appointment
sahil_kataria
Sahil Kataria

Founder and CEO

Amit Kumar QServices
Amit Kumar

Chief Sales Officer

Talk To Sales

USA

+1 (888) 721-3517

skype

Say Hello! on Skype

+91(977)-977-7248

Phil J.
Phil J.Head of Engineering & Technology​
QServices Inc. undertakes every project with a high degree of professionalism. Their communication style is unmatched and they are always available to resolve issues or just discuss the project.​

Thank You

Your details has been submitted successfully. We will Contact you soon!